A Comprehensive Comparison of Colemak vs Dvorak: Which is Better?

  • Keycaps 101
  • Posted by: carson-rutz
  • Apr 4, 2024

In the world of keyboards, QWERTY has long been king. But for those in search of efficiency and comfort, alternative layouts like Colemak vs Dvorak have emerged as compelling options. These layouts promise to revolutionize typing by reducing finger travel and increasing speed. But which one is truly better? This article aims to provide a comprehensive comparison between Colemak vs Dvorak layout.

Colemak layout (source: daskeyboard)
Colemak layout (source: daskeyboard)
Dvorak layout (source: daskeyboard)
Dvorak layout (source: daskeyboard)

Dr. August Dvorak invented the Dvorak Simplified Keyboard in the 1930s. This keyboard design, which was revolutionary, emphasized the placement of frequently used letters on the home row, maximized the alternation of hands, and minimized finger movement. Nonetheless, the expenses associated with retraining and replacing keyboards have impeded its broad acceptance.

On the other hand, Colemak was invented by Shai Coleman in 2006 to enhance typing productivity while reducing the learning process. It retains QWERTY's letter arrangement but optimizes key placement for reduced finger travel and improved ergonomics. While Qwerty and Azerty are widely used, there are other layouts designed to address specific needs. See related articles.

Features Colemak Dvorak
Alphabetic keys
  • Based on the Latin alphabet
  • Modified QWERTY layout
  • A (3rd), R (9th), S (7th), T (2nd), N (6th), E (1st), I (5th), O (4th)
  • Based on the Latin alphabet
  • Most frequently used keys are on the home row, except for the letter U
  • A (3rd), O (4th), E (1st), U (13th), H (8th), T (2nd), N (6th), S (7th)
Function Keys
  • On the top row of the keyboard
  • Same as QWERTY
  • On the top row of the keyboard
  • Same as QWERTY
Numeric and Symbolic Characters
  • On the top row of the keyboard
  • Same as QWERTY, except for the colon/semicolon key being moved above the home row
  • On the top row of the keyboard
  • Same as QWERTY, except for the most common punctuation just above the left hand’s home row
Modifier Keys
  • Same as QWERTY
  • Similar function modifier keys such as Shift, Ctrl, and Alt (or Option on Mac keyboards)
Same as QWERTY
Ergonomics Designed to reduce finger travel and minimize same-finger sequences Optimized layout to reduce finger travel (62% less compared to QWERTY)
Typing Speed Potential for higher speeds
  • The highest recorded speed on Dvorak is 194 WPM
  • Potentially faster than QWERTY, but no definitive evidence
Letter Arrangement More similar to QWERTY
  • Designed for hand alternation and optimal finger placement
  • Most used letters in the English language, E (1st) and T (2nd) on the longest fingers, the middle finger
Position of Special Characters
  • More similar to QWERTY
  • More accessible on home row (e.g., comma, period)
Most special characters are on the right side of the keyboard in Dvorak
Symbol Placement Same as QWERTY
  • Prioritizes common symbols on home row
  • Rearranged for enhancing finger efficiency
Language Focus Widely used for typing in English and other Latin-script languages such as Spanish, French, German, etc Primarily English-focused
Gaming Experience More gaming-friendly than Dvorak May require adjustment for some key placements
Compatibility Compatible with many modern operating systems Compatible with major operating systems that allow users to easily switch to Dvorak
Popularity The 3rd most widely used layout, following QWERTY and Dvorak Less popular than QWERTY
Learning Curve Easier transition from QWERTY Require more time and effort to adapt to Dvorak due to significant changes in the key arrangement

Similarities between Colemak and Dvorak keyboard layout

While Colemak vs Dvorak have different keyboard layouts, they share a few similarities:

Alphabetic keys

While distinct in layout, both Colemak and Dvorak utilize the familiar Latin alphabet and letter sequence of the English language. The sequence of letters follows the standard English alphabet. Typists who are familiar with the English language and Latin alphabet can adapt to these layouts with some practice.

Function Keys

The function keys are positioned in a similar manner in both the colemak and dvorak keyboard layouts (source: kbcovers)
The function keys are positioned in a similar manner in both the colemak and dvorak keyboard layouts (source: kbcovers)

The function keys, which are denoted as F1 to F12, are usually located in the same place on different keyboard layouts, such as Colemak and Dvorak. They are typically arranged in a row at the top of the keyboard, making it easy for users to find them regardless of the layout they are using. This consistent placement is a feature that helps to improve typing efficiency.

Numeric and Symbolic Characters

The placement of numeric and symbolic characters in the colemak and dvorak keyboard layouts is similar to optimize typing efficiency (source: keyboard-design)
The placement of numeric and symbolic characters in the colemak and dvorak keyboard layouts is similar to optimize typing efficiency (source: keyboard-design)

The characters on the top row of the keyboard, both numeric and symbolic, are usually the same in both Colemak and Dvorak layouts. This means that characters like 1, 2, 3, and 0, as well as symbols like !, @, #, $, and %, are in the same location in both layouts. This similarity can make it easier for typists who are used to the QWERTY layout to transition to Colemak or Dvorak.

Modifier Keys

Similar modifier keys of colemak and dvorak (source: key overlay)
Similar modifier keys of colemak and dvorak (source: key overlay)

Both layouts include common modifier keys like Shift, Ctrl, and Alt (or Option on Mac keyboards), maintaining this standard placement of modifier keys to ensure compatibility and familiarity for users. These keys perform similar functions, such as capitalizing letters, activation of keyboard shortcuts, and alteration of other keys’ functions.

Ergonomics

The ergonomics of qwerty, colemak, and dvorak are designed to optimize typing comfort and efficiency, but there are some small differences between them (source: reddit)
The ergonomics of qwerty, colemak, and dvorak are designed to optimize typing comfort and efficiency, but there are some small differences between them (source: reddit)

The Dvorak and Colemak keyboard layouts are alternatives to the traditional QWERTY layout, each with its own ergonomic advantages. However, Dvorak layout improves hand alternation but results in more same-finger typing, uneven hand usage, more pinky strain, and fewer comfortable key combinations. Unlike Dvorak, Colemak wasn’t designed with hand alternation as a top priority.

Related Articles

Key Differences Between Colemak and Dvorak Layout

Both the Colemak and Dvorak keyboard layouts serve as alternatives to the conventional QWERTY layout, with a design focus on enhancing typing efficiency. However, there are  some key differences between the Colemak and Dvorak keyboard layout.

Typing Speed

There is no conclusive evidence that using Dvorak or Colemak keyboard layouts can lead to faster typewriting speeds when compared to the standard QWERTY layout. This is mainly due to the relatively small number of users who employ these layouts. Moreover, switching to these layouts requires a few months of relearning and does not guarantee faster typing.

While some people claim that they have experienced significant speed improvements with Dvorak or Colemak, others have seen no difference. However, Colemak is considered to be faster than Dvorak because it utilizes the strongest and fastest fingers, resulting in a lower same-finger ratio.

After switching to a new keyboard layout, you cannot expect to type faster immediately. You will need to spend some time, likely a few months, relearning the new layout and practicing typing on it to get back up to the same speed you were able to achieve with the QWERTY layout.

Letter Arrangement

Colemak and dvorak are keyboard alternatives to qwerty that reduce finger movement and optimize typing efficiency (source: colemak2)
Colemak and dvorak are keyboard alternatives to qwerty that reduce finger movement and optimize typing efficiency (source: colemak2)

The Colemak vs Dvorak keyboard layouts arrange the keys differently. The Colemak keyboard layout is a modified version of the QWERTY layout with a focus on making typing more efficient. It rearranges the keys to ensure that the most commonly used letters in the English language, such as “R”, "E", "T", "A", "O", and "I", are all within reach of the home row. This reduces finger movement and increases typing speed. Additionally, the Colemak keyboard places frequently used letter pairs such as "TH", "HE", and "ER" in adjacent keys to further improve efficiency. Moreover, frequently used symbols such as parentheses, brackets, and slashes are easily accessible in the Colemak keyboard layout.

To Dvorak, it thoroughly modifies the positioning of letters, taking into account the frequency of each letter and the alternation of hands. Dvorak tends to cluster vowels (U, E, O, A, I) in the left-hand home row, while Colemak distributes them more evenly. Besides, in the Dvorak, the letter "L" is a commonly used key, and it replaces the position of "P" in the QWERTY layout. This means that you have to press it with your right pinky, which is actually weaker than other fingers.

The letter "R" is on the top row. It is the second most commonly used key in Dvorak, and you may notice that you have to reach for it quite often when typing. Lastly, the letter "I" is not in the home position in Dvorak, although it is still on the home row. To type "I" in Dvorak, you need to reach with your index finger. The objective is to enhance typing efficiency by reducing finger travel and optimizing the use of alternating hands. 

Symbol Placement

The position of symbol in colemak and dvorak keyboard layouts differs from the traditional qwerty layout (source: online typing)
The position of symbol in colemak and dvorak keyboard layouts differs from the traditional qwerty layout (source: online typing)

In the Colemak and Dvorak keyboard layouts, the positions of symbols differ due to the unique key arrangements designed to optimize typing efficiency and comfort. In Colemak, symbols like the exclamation mark (!), at symbol (@), hash or pound sign (#), dollar sign ($), and percent sign (%) are typically accessed by using the Shift key in combination with keys located in specific positions on the keyboard.

While that, the Dvorak layout reorganizes the symbol placement more extensively. Dvorak keyboard layout differs from Colemak by placing some symbols in different positions. For instance, the positions of symbols such as : !, @, #, $, /, and ? are swapped with ', ,, [, ], /, and ., respectively. The main goal of the Dvorak layout is to enhance finger efficiency and minimize fatigue by positioning frequently used characters on the home row, which is the natural resting place for fingers.

Language Focus

The Colemak vs Dvorak layouts differ in their language focus, meaning they prioritize different languages when designing the arrangement of keys. Colemak is a keyboard configuration created to enhance typing speed and ease for individuals who speak English. It places frequently used English letters in ergonomic positions to reduce finger movement and improve typing speed and accuracy. 

Dvorak considers the frequency of letters in several major languages, including English, Spanish, French, German, and others. It aims to optimize the arrangement of letters based on their frequency across multiple languages to provide improved typing efficiency for a wider range of languages.

Gaming Experience

The choice between colemak and dvorak for gaming largely depends on your personal preferences and the specific requirements of the games you play (source: what’s the best)
The choice between colemak and dvorak for gaming largely depends on your personal preferences and the specific requirements of the games you play (source: what’s the best)

Colemak vs Dvorak keyboard for gaming can be used effectively, but there are some differences to consider. Colemak is generally considered more gaming-friendly than Dvorak because it retains the QWERTY layout for symbol placement. However, there was a problem with certain games not recognizing the Colemak keyboard layout. It was a challenge to configure the keyboard so that playing games became effortless, especially when the controls were already customized. A few games also updated themselves to adapt to Colemak automatically.

Using the Dvorak keyboard layout can affect gaming due to its different key configurations. The common W-A-S-D movement keys in games are Comma-A-O-E in Dvorak, posing challenges for gamers. Although some games allow control remapping, not all controls can be remapped, and non-letter keys like commas may not be accepted. Additionally, some smaller games do not support remapping at all.

Compatibility

Both Colemak and Dvorak offer excellent compatibility for professional gamers.

  • Dvorak: Pre-installed on major operating systems (Windows, macOS, Linux) - Easier and faster setup.
  • Colemak: Requires additional software on Windows historically, but now officially supported. Still readily available for other major operating systems (macOS, Linux).

Therefore, Dvorak has a slight edge in initial ease of use due to native Windows support. However, Colemak's recent official Windows integration eliminates significant compatibility concerns.

For both layouts, additional software might be needed for specific games or programming environments. While both offer advantages in typing efficiency, compatibility shouldn't be a deciding factor for professional gamers as solutions exist for both options.

Popularity

In terms of popularity, Colemak has generally gained more recognition and popularity compared to Dvorak in recent years. Colemak has gained significant popularity as an alternative keyboard layout. Since its launch in 2006, it has garnered a substantial and engaged user base. Colemak has a larger user community and more readily available resources, including typing tutors, practice drills, and online forums.

In contrast, Dvorak is a keyboard layout that has not gained as much popularity as Colemak or even the QWERTY layout. Although it was initially promoted for its ergonomic benefits, Dvorak is less commonly known and used by the general population. While some resources are available for Dvorak, it may have fewer options in terms of community support and learning.

Learning Curve

The learning curve for the Colemak vs Dvorak keyboard layouts can vary depending on the individual’s typing habits and adaptability. Colemak is a keyboard layout that is easier to learn compared to Dvorak. This is because Colemak has more similarities with the traditional QWERTY layout, which is familiar to most users. Therefore, it is easier for beginners to get used to it. Begin practicing usually takes almost a week to see significant progress.

Learners can see that Dvorak has more significant changes in the key arrangement that may take more time and effort to adapt. It requires unlearning QWERTY habits and developing muscle memory for the new layout. An accomplished typist will take about 100 hours to transition to the QWERTY keyboard.

Colemak vs Dvorak: Which is Better?

The question of whether colemak or dvorak is better depends on various factors and personal preferences (source: reddit)
The question of whether colemak or dvorak is better depends on various factors and personal preferences (source: reddit)

The decision to use either the Colemak or Dvorak layout is influenced by personal preferences, requirements, and objectives. Both Colemak and Dvorak keyboard layouts have been designed to enhance typing efficiency and reduce finger strain. They achieve this by prioritizing frequently used keys on the home row and minimizing finger movement. 

Despite this similarity, there are differences in key placement and language focus between the two layouts. Colemak is more popular and has more resources available, but Dvorak has a steeper learning curve.

So, Colemak is easier to learn than other keyboards due to its similarity to QWERTY. Dvorak is offered for multilingual typists who focus on ergonomic considerations and are willing to adapt to a keyboard layout optimized for hand movements.

Conclusion

To conclude, both Colemak vs Dvorak keyboard layouts have their own advantages over the traditional QWERTY layout, but they have notable differences. It's important to understand that selecting between Colemak and Dvorak is not about crowning a universal champion; rather, it's about finding the perfect fit for your unique needs and typing style.

FAQs

Is Colemak better than Dvorak?

The choice between Colemak and Dvorak keyboard layouts is largely a matter of personal preference. Both are designed to be more efficient than the traditional QWERTY layout by reducing finger movement and increasing typing speed. 

They achieve this by placing the most frequently used keys under the strongest fingers and on the ‘home row’. A key difference is that Colemak emphasizes ‘rolls’ (typing with consecutive fingers), while Dvorak focuses on ‘alternation’ (typing with alternate hands).

Which is better for beginners – Dvorak or Colemak?

Dvorak and Colemak are popular alternative keyboard layouts for beginners. Colemak, retaining many QWERTY positions, may offer an easier transition for those familiar with QWERTY, while Dvorak’s extensive key rearrangements may require more effort to unlearn QWERTY habits. Personal preference and language usage are also important considerations. Colemak might be preferable for primarily English typing, while Dvorak could be more beneficial for multi-language use.

Is it worth changing from Dvorak to Colemak?

The decision to switch from Dvorak to Colemak depends on personal circumstances and preferences. If you’re proficient with Dvorak and it meets your needs, there’s little reason to switch. However, if Dvorak is uncomfortable or you’re not proficient, consider Colemak. It optimizes English letter arrangement and has a shallower learning curve for those familiar with QWERTY.

Is it worth changing from Colemak to Dvorak?

It’s not worth it to change from Colemak to Dvorak. If your typing speed using Colemak is already greater than 40 WPM, it is not worth switching to Dvorak. People who want to change their layout should do it only in the early stages, as Dvorak won't necessarily improve your typing skills. Instead, you just need to practice and work on your skills to become a better typist.

Tags:

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *